
Vol.
2 Number 3 �
March 17,2003
� 2003 by Stan B. Walters
All Rights Reserved
"The Psychopath"
by
Stan can be
reached by email at
Stan@TheLieGuy.com .
Stan writes, teaches & speaks internationally on deception,
interview & interrogation.
One of if not the most challenging
interviews or interrogations to conduct is that of
the psychopath.
Estimated by some experts to comprise about 7% of the
world�s population, psychopaths make up approximately 55% of
the U.S. prison population and are credited with committing
roughly 80% of the violent crimes. The interview or
interrogation of the psychopaths confirms that a standard or
routine approach that is used with all other subjects will
be not successful. As a personality disorder, psychopathy
is marked by characteristics that include a lack of empathy
for their victims, a total lack of personal insight, are
chronic liars, have no remorse and demonstrate a total lack
of impulse control.
The traditional efforts of an interrogator is to attempt to
highlight or emphasize within the subject a certain level of
awareness and acceptance of responsibility for their
behaviors. The psychopath has never and will never attain
such level of awareness. These subjects� behaviors are
dictated solely in response a narcissistic need for ego
satisfaction. Psychopaths are totally incapable of
identifying with or appreciating the level of physical,
emotional or mental pain that they cause their victims, the
victim�s families as well as their own families. To attempt
to get the psychopath to recognize the feelings, fear,
trauma or pain they have brought upon their multiple victims
is literally a waste of both the interviewer�s and subject�s
time.
Once a psychopath is stimulated by the awareness of his or
her selfish wants and needs, there is very little that will
stop them from driving toward their own elf-serving goals.
For anyone to believe that psychopaths will follow or adhere
to any standards of appropriate social behavior or conduct
is na�ve at best. These subject�s perceive the world and
it�s occupants as existing only for the purpose of serving
their own needs that are not to be denied. It is for this
very reason that psychopaths will rarely if ever respond to
any punishment or threat of punishment, treatment or therapy
for their inappropriate behavior. This is also evident in
the broad range of and often-large number of anti-social
behaviors in which the psychopath will engage.
Psychopaths possess a very high threshold of cognitive and
emotional stimulation that requires extremes in behaviors to
maintain any form of satisfactory or stimulating life style.
Coupled with a total lack of regard for socially acceptable
conduct, psychopaths are well known for engaging high risk,
self-destructive behaviors that are also very devastating to
those around them. Blatant sexually deviant behaviors and
promiscuity, major acts of sado-masochistic behavior,
abandonment of family, schoolwork and jobs are not uncommon
as are multiple acts of fraud, deceit, and blatant abuse and
manipulation of others.
The interview of the psychopath are best accomplished when
the interviewer bares in mind that the subject will not be
swayed by pleas or appeals based on sympathy, remorse,
regret or social obligation as the psychopath is incapable
of comprehending these concepts. The interview should be
based on the non-emotional format with the interviewer
presenting the appearance that he or she already possesses
all the known facts of the case. The dialogue with the
psychopath should center around facts and specific examples
of evidence and information and that there are those who may
in fact be impressed with the subject�s genuine
individuality and independence and that others around them
are in fact weak, lack the fortitude experience the
fulfillment of life. Threats of punishment are of no use.
One interesting point however is that it would appear that
the more these subjects are allowed to talk and even
pontificate or sound off, the stronger and more resistant
they become. It will be imperative that the interviewer
maintain focus and keep the subject on topic during the
interview. Admission or confessions occur because the
subject delights in his or her behavior, the evidence of how
everyone is shocked but yet awed by their audacity and
ultimately that the feel in some way the admission or
confession serves some other form of the ego fulfilling
needs.
With even this admittedly very brief and limited description
of psychopathy can anyone not recognize the behaviors of
Iraq�s Saddam Hussein and his long history of abuse of his
enemies as well as his own countrymen as being those of a
psychopath? What are the odds that he has ever, will ever,
or has even ever intended to comply with the demands of the
reticent United Nations or any other civilized country?
� 2003 by Stan B. Walters All Rights Reserved